logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.03.22 2017고합113
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Gohap 113]

1. On October 23, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (defluence, etc.) was released from the victim D (26:36 at the convenience store located in the north-gu, North Korea, and damaged the call while taking a portable phone from the victim D (26:3). Around that time, the Defendant voluntarily appeared in the F police box located in the north-gu, North Korea upon the victim’s 112 report, and was investigated into the police as a crime of damage to property against the victim. Around October 29, 2017, at the convenience store located in the north-gu, North Korea, there was a problem of head hyp because the Defendant hyp caused the death of the victim.

When making good words, the complaint shall be withdrawn.

We see the mobile phone brought to the mobile phone.

In addition, the withdrawal of the complaint must be wrong.

The purpose of this paper is to suggest the following: “A large number of people around the inside and outside of the country” and the door was to gather the door in the above convenience store, and continuously read as “any children who have children enough to enter the cater,” and the middle door was to close the door to the victim and to threaten the body of the victim, and to threaten the victim.

2. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties entered the “I” restaurant for the “I” restaurant operated by the victim H located in North-gu G in the north-gu, Mapo-si on December 4, 2017 and whether the Defendant “I will be traumaed.”

Whether there is anything else or not.

After concluding the phrase, “the victim shall have no credit, and there shall be no credit,” the victim heard the phrase “at the outside of the restaurant,” and obstructed the victim’s work four times in total on the same day as indicated in attached Table 1, by force, such as “the fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright fright.”

[2018 Gohap 3] The Defendant is a taxi engineer at J-si around November 1, 2017.

arrow