logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1961. 10. 5. 선고 4294형상356 판결
[국가보안법위반][집9형,134]
Main Issues

In the case of joining an anti-government organization, performing the duty of guidance thereafter, and conducting general affairs;

Summary of Judgment

In the case of joining the anti-government organization and performing the guidance duty thereafter, it is reasonable to be punished by a single comprehensive crime, which is the point of joining the organization and is engaged in guidance duty.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 1 subparag. 3 of the National Security Act (Act No. 10), Article 3 of the National Security Act (Act No. 10), Article 17 of the National Security Act (Act No. 500), Article 6 of the National Security Act (Act No. 549), Article 8 of the National Security Act (Act No. 549)

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor Kim Sung-jin

Escopics

Defendant

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court, Seoul High Court, Seoul High Court, etc.

Reasons

In the case of joining an anti-state organization and engaging in a guidance duty thereafter, it is reasonable to treat the case as a single crime, including the points of joining the anti-state organization and the points of leading duty, and the judgment of the court below is unfair as not only because it was unfair that the fact that the court below recognized the anti-state organization and determined the extinctive prescription was completed, but also that it was not guilty on the ground that there was no punishment law at the time, even though the court below recognized the fact that the court below consulted in the Northwest area, it did not affect the judgment by wrong application of the law, so the judgment of the court below is improper.

Justices Cho Jin-jin (Presiding Justice)

arrow