logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.15 2013가단27852
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants: 15,98 won, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E respectively; 6,124,665 won, and 3,767,713 won, respectively, to Plaintiff F.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On October 16, 2012, Defendant J, while driving a cargo vehicle of K (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) around 14:10 on October 16, 2012, led to Defendant J to the front side of the said vehicle, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive by taking into account the traffic conditions on the front side and right side of the instant vehicle, while neglecting the duty of care to safely drive by taking into account the traffic conditions on the front side of the instant vehicle.

(2) On November 24, 2012, the deceased died of spawn spawn typitis and spawnosis on the left-hand brutosis, etc. while receiving medical treatment from an original university hospital by suffering from injury, such as the opening frame of the upper-hand brut boms, which requires medical treatment for about 12 weeks of the instant accident.

(3) The Plaintiff’s husband, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E are the deceased’s children, and Plaintiff F is the deceased’s wife, Plaintiff G, and H are the deceased’s children.

(4) Defendant I is the owner of the instant vehicle, and the Defendant further indemnity insurance company is the insurer who entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the instant vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence No. 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal of the medical records to the president of the Korean Medical Association of this Court, according to the result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal of the school room of the Seoul University’s University’s University’s University’s law, the deceased suffered from an injury, such as the opening frame of the upper left-hand body, etc., and during the treatment, the deceased’s operation was conducted on the part of the deceased, and the fact that the spawnosis infection and the s

According to this, the causal relationship between the accident of this case and the death of the deceased can be recognized. Defendant J, the driver of this case, Defendant I, the owner of the vehicle of this case, and Defendant further accident insurance company.

arrow