logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2017.11.14 2017노471
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The lower court’s sentence (one year of imprisonment) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unfasible and unreasonable.

2. The determination of sentencing is based on the statutory penalty, based on the discretionary determination that takes place within a reasonable and appropriate scope by taking into account the factors constituting the conditions for sentencing as prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, and there is a unique area of the first deliberation in our criminal litigation law taking the trial-oriented principle and the principle of directness.

In addition, in light of these circumstances and the ex post facto in-depth nature of the appellate court, it is reasonable to respect the sentencing in the event that there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of the discretion. Although the sentence of the first instance falls within the reasonable scope of the discretion, it is desirable to reverse the first instance judgment on the sole ground that the sentence of the first instance falls within the scope of the discretion of the appellate court, and to refrain from imposing a sentence that does not differ from the first instance court (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015, etc.). Since the new materials on sentencing have not been submitted in the health department and the appellate court, there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the lower court, and even if considering all the reasons for the sentencing stated by the lower court, it is not recognized that the sentencing of the lower court exceeded the reasonable scope of the discretion by being too unfford.

Therefore, the prosecutor's assertion that the defendant's punishment determined by the court below is too minor is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow