beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 100,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 15, 2012 to April 30, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 8, 2011, Nonparty Nanoa Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nanoa”) acquired the implementation project of the Daegu Seo-gu Complex Project (hereinafter “instant implementation project”) from the New Industry Development Co., Ltd. and the KM Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Seoul”) by transfer.
On April 201, the Plaintiff introduced consulting services for the implementation of the instant case from LIG securities D, which is the Plaintiff’s seat, and consulted on the order of the above services with the Defendant Company for which E, which is the Plaintiff’s seat, is an internal director.
B. Around April 201, Defendant Company provided services to provide services necessary to select a financial institution and a Si corporation with respect to the instant implementation project so that it can smoothly perform the implementation project, and the service price shall be KRW 50 million (excluding value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the down payment shall be KRW 220 million (excluding value added tax; hereinafter the same shall apply), and at the time of entering into a trust agreement with the trust company, the remainder of KRW 110 million out of the remainder shall be paid within three days after the commencement of sale; and the remainder of KRW 220 million shall be paid within one month after the commencement of sale (hereinafter the “instant service agreement”).
C. On November 7, 2011, the Plaintiff, as the head of the development project headquarters of the Defendant Company, took charge of the practice of the instant service contract, along with F, who is the Plaintiff’s successor and E’s will. On November 7, 201, the Defendant Company paid KRW 165 million out of the down payment under the instant service contract to the Defendant Company. The Defendant Company paid KRW 50 million to the Plaintiff.
In early 2012, nanotechnology began to sell the instant implementation project. Accordingly, the Defendant Company requested the payment of the remainder under the instant service agreement on February 14, 2012 and March 27, 2012, nanotechnology, and nanotechnology on March 29, 2012, as the project cost.