beta
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are examined.
상고이유의 주장은, 피고인은 피해자가 피고인의 얼굴을 때리고 안경을 부러뜨리자 이를 제지하기 위하여 피해자의 배 위에 올라타 손목을 잡았고(2012. 3. 24.자 상해의 점), 피해자가 아파트의 화장실 문을 잠가버리자 망치로 문을 부수고 들어가 망치의 고무 손잡이 부분으로 피해자의 머리를 2회 툭 친 사실이 있을 뿐(2012. 4. 4.자 상해의 점) 공소사실과 같이 상해를 가한 사실이 없음에도 원심이 사실을 오인하여 피고인을 유죄로 인정하였으니 이는 위법하다는 취지이다.
However, the recognition of facts and the selection and evaluation of evidence conducted on the premise thereof are within the discretionary power of the fact-finding court unless it exceeds the limit of the free evaluation of evidence.
The judgment below
Even if examining the reasons in light of the record, the court below cannot find out the reasons that the court below exceeded the limit of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.
Therefore, the above argument in the grounds of appeal is merely to criticize the matters falling under the exclusive authority of the court below, and it does not constitute a legitimate ground of appeal.
In addition, even if examining records, it is not recognized that the judgment below erred by misapprehending the concept of injury and the legal principles on the principle of trial on evidence, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.