logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.08.12 2013고정415
식품위생법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who operates D in Chungcheongnam-gun C.

No one shall sell foods, etc. manufactured, processed, or subdivided by any person other than a business operator, or collect, manufacture, import, process, use, cook, store, subdivide, transport or display such foods for sale, and any person who intends to operate a food manufacturing or processing business shall register such foods with the competent authority by type of business.

Nevertheless, the defendant without registering the same year from May 14, 2013.

7. From the end of February, 22, a facility that can produce and process foods, such as water supply facilities, work belts, gas pipes, and large slicks, was installed within the aforementioned D, and around 75,201 g of the sea wave, manufactured and processed (one-day hereinafter referred to as “one-day click ginseng”) by using approximately 89 g of the sea water for living, and sold or stored them for sale.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of E, F, and G;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the set of trade books;

1. Article 94 of the Food Sanitation Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime, Article 94 of the same Act and Article 4 subparagraph 7 of the same Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Judgment on the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Whether the Defendant’s act constitutes a processing of fishery products, the Defendant merely argued that the act of building biological ginseng does not constitute the manufacturing or processing of food as stipulated under the Food Sanitation Act. However, according to the evidence presented earlier, the Defendant employed the figures from the above D and removed the interior of the biological ginseng, and then made a so-called “self-defluence ginseng” by using 20 to 30 minutes on the Gads Gads Gads Gads Gads Dods Dods Dods Dods Dods Dods Dods Dods Dods la

arrow