beta
Text
1. Defendant A and Defendant B jointly and severally filed against the Plaintiff KRW 87,485,98 and KRW 80,000,000 among them.
Reasons
. We examine whether Defendant B was in excess of the obligation at the time of the instant donation contract or was in excess of the obligation due to such excess (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2002Da27903, Aug. 27, 2002).
* At the time of the instant gift contract with positive property, each of the real estate in this case, the land and the building on the ground in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “D Real Estate”), the self-reliance deposit against the North Seoul Agricultural Cooperative, and the insurance premium paid to each insurance company, as described below, is not in dispute between the parties, and according to the evidence Nos. 7, 8, and Nos. 2, 19, and 25, the value of the said active property is the aggregate of KRW 1,15,786,732.
The value of each real estate of this case 1 / [Attachment 1] 1,15,786,732 / [Attachment 1] of the premium paid to each insurance company of 15,00,718,580 of the premium paid to each insurance company of 153,80,780,786,732 / [Attachment 1] of the premium paid to each insurance company of 390,718,580 of the building D and ground buildings of this case 595,020,750 of the real estate of this case 2 at the time of the donation contract of this case / [Attachment 4,8, Eul, and Eul, 9,19,20,20,222 of the premium of this case / [Attachment 2] * According to the facts that there is no dispute over a negative property of this case / At the time of the donation contract of this case, the defendant Eul was liable for the same debt as the
The Industrial Bank 1 Bank 97,664,430 4,386,780 2 South Korea Bank 199,241,356,356 3 Korean National Bank 144,000,000 4 Han Bank 80,000 5,000,000 5,000 5,000,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 60,000 60,000 180,000,000 40,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 or more of the secured debt guaranteed by the Seoul National Agricultural Cooperative of North Korea, Seoul 2,00,000,000,00 80,000,000,00 won guaranteed by the principal guaranteed by the property of this case