Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 23, 2016, at around 22:45, the Defendant: (a) boarded a taxi operated by the victim E, who is a taxi engineer, on the front of the D Mart located in Jeju Island; (b) filed a complaint with the victim stating that “it is difficult for the victim to go up to 20,000 won; and (c) when the said taxi was transferred back to the front of the F building in Jeju Island, the Defendant shall discarded down the victim’s shot, shot, dead, and discarded.

“In doing so, it was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 15 minutes, such as plucking, plucking, dumping, plucking, plucking, etc. of the above taxi, after getting off the taxi at the same time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's taxi operation by force.

2. On September 23, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) on September 23, 2016, the Defendant: (b) received a 112 report and received inquiry from H about personal information from a policeman belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station G District; and (c) on September 23, 2016, “No name exists and the quid pro quo exists or falls short of a hole.”

In doing so, “I am to go home,” and “I am to go home, I am to go home, I am to go home,” and assaulted the part of his left river once by generating it.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. E statements;

1. Investigation report (Investigation related toCCTV images) and investigation report (related to voice recording at the site of the case);

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant was on board his own for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.