logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.7.11.선고 2019고합41 판결
폭행치사,폭행,폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Cases

2019 Highly 41 Violence, Death or assault

Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Joint Violence)

Defendant

A

Prosecutor

Korean Supreme Court Decision 201Hun-Ga44 decided May 1, 201

Defense Counsel

Law Firm B

Attorney C

Imposition of Judgment

July 11, 2019:

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019, 41"

피고인은 2019. 1. 12. 02:30경 김해시 D에 있는 E식당 가게 앞 인도에서 걸어가던 중 피해자 F(21세)이 일행인 G와 이야기를 하다가 피고인과 부딪힌 후 부딪힌 사람이 피고인임을 확인하고 고개를 숙여 "죄송합니다"라고 사과를 하였음에도 기분이 풀리지 않아 손바닥으로 위 F의 얼굴에 갖다 대고 때리려고 시늉하였고, 마침 위 F의 친구인 피해자 H(21세)이 맞은편 I식당에서 나오면서 그 모습을 보고 "무슨 일인데"라고 말을 하며 다가오자 위 H에게 "니는 또 뭔데", "니 일로 와봐라"라고 말을 하며 손바닥으로 위 H의 뺨을 1회 가격하였다. 이후 피해자들이 고개를 숙여 "죄송합니다"라고 사과를 하였음에도 피고인은 화가 풀리지 않아 욕설하던 중 열중쉬어 자세로 사과하던 위 F과 눈이 마주치자 오른손 손바닥 아래쪽 딱딱한 부위로 위 F의 왼쪽 턱 윗부위를 아래에서 위쪽으로 힘껏 1회 올려쳤고, 그 충격으로 위 F이 그 자리에서 의식을 잃고 그대로 뒤로 넘어지게 하여 인도와 차도의 경계석의 모서리에 뒤통수를 부딪치게 하였다.

Around that time, the Defendant abused the victim, and transferred the victim to K Hospital in the Kimhae-siJ and received treatment, and transferred the two types of surgery to the Ma Hospital in Yangsan-si L, but went into brain death, and had the victim go into brain death. On the 21st of the same month, around 20:20, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to damage to the head part of the hospital, such as the bones of hair, salivosis, salivosis, salivosis, and cerebral salphe, etc.

"2019, 64"

피고인은 N, O, P, Q와 함께 2019. 1. 12. 01:50경 김해시 R에 있는 'S식당' 앞 노상에서, N의 여자친구가 피해자 T(22세), U(22세), V(22세), W(22세)을 향해 "뭘 쳐다보노 씹할새끼야"라고 욕설을 하며 시비를 걸고 이에 피해자들이 "안 봤다 가라", "욕을 하지 말라"라는 등으로 대응하는 과정에서 시비가 되었고 이에 위 T가 그 장면을 휴대폰으로 촬영하려고 하자 N은 주먹으로 위 T의 얼굴을 주먹으로 1회 때리고, 피고인은 손바닥으로 위 U의 뺨을 1회 때린 후 계속하여 손으로 위 V의 가슴을 밀친 후 V의 뒷목을 붙잡아 끌고, O는 위 U의 얼굴을 머리로 1회 들이받고, 위 V의 목을 손으로 1회 밀치고, 위 W의 목을 손으로 1회 때리고, P는 위 U의 얼굴에 침을 뱉고, Q는 위 U의 멱살을 잡아 흔드는 등으로 피해자들을 폭행하였다.

Ultimately, the Defendant assaulted victims jointly with N,O, P, Q.

Summary of Evidence

"2019, 41"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement on X, Y, G, H, and Z;

1. A medical certificate;

1. A written autopsy report and a written appraisal of genes of the National Institute of Scientific Investigation;

1. Investigation reports (including the submission of data, such as a report on the occurrence of a victim's death or death, and the exhaustion of laws related to private individuals;

(B) The filing of a copy of the written verification of autopsy or autopsy;

"2019, 64"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of T, U,W, and V;

1. Report of investigation (Attachment of CCTV images taken at a criminal scene);

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 262 and 259(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of death or injury caused by violence), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act, Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

Reasons for sentencing

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Three to thirty-five years of imprisonment;

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) First offense (Death or injury caused by violence);

[Determination of Punishment] In the event of the occurrence of death of a violent crime [Type 3]

【Special Convicted Person】

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendation] Basic Field, 2-4 years of imprisonment

(b) Second crime;

[Determination of Punishment] Violence Crimes 03. Assault Crimes / [Class 1] General Violence Crimes

【Special Convicted Person】

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendations] Basic Field, Imprisonment from February to October

(c) Class 3 crime (Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act);

[Determination of Punishment] Violence Crimes 03. Assault Crimes / [Class 1] General Violence Crimes

[Special Sentencings] Reductions: In a case where punishment is not imposed (including serious efforts for recovery of damage) or substantial damage has been recovered.

[Recommendation and Scope of Recommendations] Reduction Area, Imprisonment from one month to eight months

(d) Scope of recommendations according to the standards for handling multiple crimes: Two to four years of imprisonment (the first crime maximum + the second crime maximum + 1/2 of the third crime maximum + 1/3 of the third crime maximum).

(e) Scope of recommended sentences revised by applicable sentences: Imprisonment with prison labor for three to four years (in cases where the lower limit of the range of sentence recommended by the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory lower limit of applicable sentences, it shall be based on the statutory lower limit of applicable sentences);

3. Determination of sentence;

The Defendant did not participate in the process, even though it was small time with the victims, and did not commit each of the instant crimes at an interval of one hour on the same day, and used repeated violence, such as committing each of the instant crimes. Furthermore, the instant case between the Defendant and the victim F and H committed an assault against the victims on the ground that the victims continued to have committed a crime, even though the victims did not have been forced to do so, and eventually led to the death of the victim network F, which was over twenty years old. Family members of the victim networkF wanted to be punished by the Defendant’s severe punishment, and the Defendant seems to have suffered a large amount of suffering from the instant accident. Considering these circumstances, it is reasonable to punish the Defendant with strict punishment.

However, the defendant reflects the wrongness of the defendant, and the victims and victims of the case 2019Gohap64 have reached an agreement. There was no criminal conviction exceeding the fine for the defendant. Other circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, circumstances before and after the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, which are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, shall be determined as ordered by the sentence.

The presiding judge

Judges Lee Jae-soo

Judge Yellow-il

Judges Lee Byung-il

arrow