The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. No person charged shall transfer or acquire any passbook, cash card, password, etc., which is a financial institution, or establish a pledge, unless otherwise provided for in other Acts;

Nevertheless, around May 2012, the Defendant received 300,000 won from a person who was not injured at a city in Seoul, and transferred the means of access used in electronic financial transactions by transferring to him the passbook (Account Number B) opened in the name of the Defendant to a new bank.

2. According to the Defendant’s legal statement and the statement of the decision of summary order rendered on the order of summary order No. 2012 high-level 8214, the Defendant, as of January 18, 2013, filed a prosecution for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by a prosecutor of the Suwon District Court, and then filed a prosecution for the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act with a prosecutor of the Suwon District Court, against the case on January 18, 2013, filed a request for formal trial against the above decision and the case is pending in the Suwon District Court, and according to the evidence, it is evident that the facts charged in the instant case, which was prosecuted on January 21, 2013, are the same as those charged for the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and thus, the prosecution in the instant case, which was instituted, is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 3 of the Criminal Procedure Act.