logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.10.16 2018나50717
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the defendant C's appeal are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s acceptance of the judgment is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of first instance as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the above facts, Defendant B filed a false complaint against the Plaintiff on the charge of occupational embezzlement, and had the Plaintiff prosecuted for occupational embezzlement (Skcheon District Court 201No. 115, Jun. 14, 2011). The Defendants appeared as witness on June 14, 201 in the above criminal trial, and issued the above evidence 1 and 2 in relation to occupational embezzlement. Accordingly, it is sufficiently recognized in light of the empirical rule that the Plaintiff suffered mental suffering from the Defendant’s non-indicted 1 and 2’s mental suffering. Furthermore, in light of the fact that each act of the Defendants was committed in a criminal case, ② the evidence 1 and 2 of this case was committed, ③ the Plaintiff did not have any mental suffering, and ④ the Defendants did not have any mental suffering from each of the above crimes. In light of the above facts, the Defendants appeared as witness in the above criminal trial, and the Defendants did not have any mental suffering from each of the above crimes.

arrow