1. All of the ancillary claims shall be dismissed;

2. The plaintiff's primary claim and the first preliminary claim are all available.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a housing redevelopment development project partnership established on December 18, 2007, and the plaintiff is the owner of the land within the rearrangement zone of the above project.

B. On October 22, 2014, the Defendant, while publicly announcing the details of land or structures subject to parcelling-out, the period and place of application for parcelling-out, the qualification for application for parcelling-out, and the method of application for parcelling-out, divided the following information into members:

(hereinafter referred to as "the public notice of the application for parcelling-out in this case" and "the public notice of the application for parcelling-out in this case" were calculated by the defendant, referring to the previous appraised value under the management and disposition plan of the project area located from 200 to 300 meters away from the project area in this case, for the purpose of calculating

Application for parcelling-out;

(d) Proportional ratio (1) for the calculation of a rough charge = Total estimated amount of the sites and facilities after completion of the project in the zone 】 Total project cost 】 (9) 100.13% = 437,887,832,250 (estimated amount) - 291,70,000,000 (estimated amount) x 146,000,000,000 (estimated amount) x 106,000,000 (estimated amount);

(2) A 131 (39.62 square meters) 29,000 (42.35 square meters) 28,002 B 125 (34.45 square meters) 28,000 (37.45 square meters) 28,000 (54.45 square meters) 37,80 3144 (43.56 square meters) 29,000 (4.56 square meters) 29,000 (4.46 square meters) 29,000 (4.45 square meters) 30,000 (4.56 square meters) 29,000 (43.56 square meters) 30,000 (51.42 square meters) 37,200,307,404 41444 (25.65), 30,508 (305 square meters) 30,5198