logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.12.22 2016고단4372
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On August 22, 2002, around 10:43, A, an employee of the specific defendant in the facts charged, violated the vehicle operation restriction at the Korea Highway Branch, Gun self-inspection station, located 19.8km in the direction to newly build the coast Highway. 2. The judgment and the conclusion is that the prosecutor applied Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8676, Mar. 21, 2008; where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83(1)2 of the above Act, Article 86 of the above Act provides that the fine shall be imposed on the corporation retroactively pursuant to the Constitution (Article 83(1)2 of the Constitutional Court Act; 203Hun-Ga36, Oct. 28, 201010; 36.).

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant is released under Article 58 (2) of the Criminal Act, and the decision is delivered with the disposition.

arrow