A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person operating a “C cafeteria,” and the victim D (year 42) is a person who works as a principal assistant in an “E cafeteria.”

At around 00:30 on June 3, 2015, the Defendant found the above “Ecafeteria” operated by G in Jeju City F along with H, an employee of the said “Ccafeteria, and then the victim previously endeded the c cafeteria at “C cafeteria,” and the victim saw it as “packer and hacker,” and the victim said it as “packer and hacker” to the Defendant, the victim saw it as “packer and hacker,” and the victim saw it as “packer and hacker,” the hack (18Cm in length per day), which is an object dangerous from inside the inside the inside c rack in the left hand by taking the victim’s body sealed with it, and threatened the victim’s hack on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of D or G preparation;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of imprisonment;

1. The scope of recommendation, sentence (the crime group, intimidation, type 4 (Special Intimidation of Habitual Cumulative Offense), basic area, term of June to June) on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act and the following circumstances: A normal circumstances that are favorable to the determination of the sentence as ordered: A person recognized the facts of crime and reflects it; a normal situation that has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime: A person who does not receive a letter from a victim; other circumstances that may be taken into account in some of the circumstances; the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc.;