The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant is against the gist of the grounds for appeal, the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendant (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant are that the defendant recognized all of the crimes and seriously reflects the fact that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime, and that there is no good health condition.

However, the crime of this case committed by the Defendant, by sharing the role of the Defendant with his accomplice, is committed by the Defendant, and the method of committing the crime is intelligent and damaged, and the victim’s damage is not recovered at all even after the trial, etc. are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

In full view of the aforementioned circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and other circumstances revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court appears to have taken into account most favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that would vary from the lower court’s punishment.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.