Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In the event of the instant accident, the Defendant did not have driven a Cbeer or a car (hereinafter referred to as the “instant vehicle”) which is a vehicle for the damage at the time of the instant accident.

The sentence of unfair sentencing (10 months of imprisonment) by the court below is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The judgment of the court below on the assertion of mistake of facts is recognized as follows based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the victims, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, “vehicles caused the instant traffic accident, were white bee or a car, and one driver was on board, but he was physically blick male. The victim’s number was confirmed immediately after the traffic accident, and stored on the victim Fblon.” The credibility is sufficiently recognized by consistently stated the following circumstances. ② A car specified based on the above victims’ statement, was actually white bee or a car, and there was a c car was a slick down on the left side side, ③ even according to the Defendant’s statement, the vehicle was registered in the name of Defendant I, and since 2011, the Defendant was a vehicle with which the Defendant was in mixed custody, and ④ the Defendant was not aware of the fact of the instant traffic accident from the investigative agency to the 15th day of the instant accident, and was not aware of the contact at the market of the instant case.”

“A statement to the effect that” was made, and ⑤ The Defendant asserts that the page of the instant vehicle does not fit the height of the damaged vehicle, and that it does not fit the height of the damaged vehicle at the police site.