beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
2. A certified copy of the register of the forest land of 28,832 square meters in Ansan-si.
Reasons
1. Judgment on the plaintiff's claim
A. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 3 and 5 as to the claim for partition of co-owned property, the Plaintiff, Defendant B, and Defendant C, respectively, owned 1/5 shares, 1/10 shares, 1/10 shares, 3/55 shares, Defendant G, H, I, and J respectively, and the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendants did not reach an agreement on partition as to the forest of this case.
The co-owners of real estate may at any time request the other co-owners to divide the land jointly owned (Article 268(1) main sentence of Article 268(1) of the Civil Act and Article 268(1) of the same Act). Since co-owners are entitled to demand the partition of the land jointly owned, the co-owners may demand the partition of the land jointly owned, which is the common property of this case between the Plaintiff and the Defendants, without the agreement on partition of the forest land of this case
B. (1) The method of partition of co-owned property can be selected at will if the co-owners reach an agreement, but if the co-owned property is divided by a trial due to the failure to reach an agreement, the court shall in principle divide it in kind, and if it is impossible to divide it in kind or if it is possible to divide it in kind, the auction of the property can be ordered only when the value of the property is likely to decrease substantially. Thus, barring the above circumstances, the court shall make a judgment that recognizes the sole ownership of each co-owner for the divided property by dividing the jointly-owned property into several items in kind at the share of each co-owner, and each co-owner's sole ownership for the divided property shall be recognized according to the share ratio of the co-owner at the discretion of the court, and the method of partition shall not be determined by the parties, but by the reasonable division according to the share ratio of the co-owner at the discretion of the court.