Text
1. As to shares in 2/9 of the real estate listed in the separate sheet:
A. The inherited property of February 13, 2015 between the Defendant and B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. B jointly and severally guaranteed a loan agreement entered into with Samsung Card Co., Ltd. on August 15, 2003. On December 10, 2009, “B shall pay to Samsung Card Co., Ltd. 40,410,170 won and 18,049,470 won among them at the rate of 20% per annum from November 28, 2009 to the date of full payment.” The above payment order was issued to the effect that “B shall pay to Samsung Card Co., Ltd. 40,410,170 won at the rate of 20% per annum from November 28, 2009 to the date of full payment.” The above payment order was finalized around that time.
B. On May 29, 2013, the Plaintiff acquired the claim for the joint and several several surety deposit amount against Samsung Card Co., Ltd. and Solomon Savings Bank, from the Nemans Ltd., which was acquired before the transfer of the claim for the joint and several surety deposit amount from the Nemans Ltd., and the claim for
C. D who owned real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) died on September 15, 199, and was his heir E, B, Defendant, and F. However, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant real estate on September 15, 199, based on “an inheritance by agreement division” as of February 16, 2015, 10420, received on February 16, 2015, such as Daegu District Court and Racing Support, etc.
【Ground of recognition】 A without dispute, entry (including additional number) in Gap evidence 1 through 4, the purport of whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. On the other hand, the Defendant asserts that the agreement on the division of inherited property regarding the instant real estate on the division of inherited property on February 13, 2015, while the agreement on the division of inherited property on the division of inherited property on the instant real estate on the division of inherited property is on September 15, 199, as stated in the register, and thus, the agreement on division of inherited property
However, when there was a legal act corresponding to a fraudulent act, the date on which such fraudulent act was actually committed should be determined as a standard, and such fraudulent act is actually conducted based on the date on which the cause of registration appears to be based on a disposal document, unless there are other special circumstances.