Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,500,000 won. If the Defendant fails to pay the said fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a Pasatat car.

On December 23, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on the 13:00 on December 23, 2013, and proceeded along the intersection of the Triju Pung Pung Pung Pung Stung-gu, which is located in the gold village of the Priju, along the two-lanes from the parallel to the Triju Police Station, and became a U-turn in order to proceed again with the opposite lane.

It is a zone where the internship is prohibited, so in such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to refrain from making an internship.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the Epoter II freezing, which was driven by the injured party D(the age of 37) who was majud in the opposite line, due to the negligence of the Defendant, in violation of the signal, from the back part of the said car operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the said victim by occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time damaged the said damaged vehicle to have approximately KRW 5,192,385, such as the exchange of post-art panions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident in F;

1. An investigation report (finite, etc. of signal systems), an investigation report, and a written estimate of the damaged vehicle;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination of the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be made by the defendant and defense counsel, and the victim's signal.