1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. This Court shall enter into July 1, 2014 with respect to applications for suspension of compulsory execution by this Court 2014 Chicago1028.

1. On June 10, 2014, the fact that the Defendant executed a seizure of corporeal movables on the attached list in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “the instant movable property”) based on the original copy of the executory payment order issued by the court No. 201453, 2014, 1653 of this Court against Nonparty B, as the Defendant around June 10, 2014, is no dispute between the parties.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is the plaintiff's possession of the movable property of this case, and the plaintiff is not entitled to compulsory execution against B.

The plaintiff's assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to acknowledge that the movable property of this case is owned by the plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.