logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2019.11.20 2018가합5963
손해배상(기)
Text

1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 36,09,547, and Plaintiff B’s money KRW 92,018,453, and each of the said money, the Defendant began on November 18, 2016.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

D The “G” bank operated by the father F of D in the Gu of Cheongju-si from B from B in 2013 to January 2018, 2018, provides the victims with the proceeds from the market price marginal profit within one month by purchasing the lowest price during the summer period and selling the maximum price again during the summer period. The principal may not be seen as losses because it can be sold a short-term gold, such as the shares guaranteed by the State, and it will not be deemed that it will reduce the price to 8,000 won per gold and guarantee the principal. However, even if it receives the money under the pretext of investing in the gold from the victims, it is thought that most of the money was paid to other investors under the pretext of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes, the victims did not receive the investment principal or receive the investment principal from the victims under the pretext of 200 years under the pretext of reporting the violation of the Act and 2060 years under the pretext of 260 years under the pretext of the above reporting the amount to 360 years under the same Act.

[Cheongju District Court Decision 2018Da35 decided August 17, 2018; Daejeon High Court Decision 2018No140 decided February 14, 2019; Supreme Court Decision 2019Do3205 Decided April 25, 2019] Joint with D, the Defendant is the same from April 28, 2016 to January 2, 2018.

In the same manner as described in paragraph A, B, H, I, and J in total as investments. 1,934.

arrow