The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (two years of suspended execution in August, and eight hours of community service order) is too unreasonable in light of the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment of the court below seems to result in the crime of this case because the business operated by the defendant is difficult, and the defendant is deemed to have no specific penalty power, other than once a minor fine is imposed for a crime different from this case, but it has not yet been recovered, and the fairness in the case similar to this case should be considered. In full view of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, method of crime and result, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, etc., it is difficult to deem that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.