1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.

On September 10, 1999, at around 15:04, at around 15:04, at the time of permanent residence on the line of the national highway 5, the defendant's employees, he operated the above vehicle by loading more than 1.35 tons of B car trucks to 3 1.35 tons, and more than 11.35 tons of B car trucks to 4 11.35 tons of the restricted axis.

Judgment

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case, "If an agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine under the relevant Article.

“The portion” was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [see Constitutional Court Order 2010Hun-Ga14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (Joint)] on October 28, 201.

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly announced pursuant to Article 440 of the Criminal Procedure Act.