Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2017, the Defendant found any chemical material that was left between the entrance door and the delivery of the victim D at the time of light lighting around 01:10 on July 26, 2017, the Defendant covered with the network to prevent the victim from bringing the chemical material into the network, walking with the network by breaking the network so that the victim may not bring the chemical material to others, and brought one chemical material to the victim.

8. On 20. 20. 01:50 around the same method, one fire powder was cut off on 220,000 won in total, on 21. 02:00 around the same month, including bringing three fire powder in the same manner at the same place, each of which was owned by the victim, on 3 occasions.

On August 30, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Godan 2528, 2528, the Defendant, while getting on and moving a electric wheelchairs in front of the F-ro at the luminous seat of the Gyeonggi-si on August 30, 2017, on the ground that the victim G was parked in a crosswalk with the crosswalk, on the ground that the vehicle in the SSM type (S6) was obstructed by the Defendant’s passage, the HSM type (S6) was parked in the direction opposite to the repair cost to the extent that the 258,062 won was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2445"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Each photograph;

1. Protocols of seizure and the list of seizure [2017 Highest 2528];

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written estimate of equipment;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, committed each of the instant crimes without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, even though he was under the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.

However, there seems to be an attitude against the defendant, that there is no significant damage to each of the crimes of this case, that there is an agreement with the victims.