logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.11.09 2016고단4345
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around 14:00 on July 28, 2016, the Defendant expressed the attitude of the victim D (the age of 49) at the C re-building site in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, with the public official in charge of re-building in Nowon-gu, and with the public official in charge of re-building at the construction site, to set up a construction site, and to make a resistance against noise generated at the construction site. B, the Defendant repeatedly expressed the desire to “I am fribly, if I am frith during that time, I am frith, so I am frith, so I am frith, so I am am frith, so I am frith, so I am a frith of frith, so I am a frith of frith.”

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. Since an agreement containing the intent of the victim who does not want punishment was submitted to this court on November 8, 2016, the above part of the indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow