logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.17 2019나59280
공사대금
Text

All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this case by the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Decision] The plaintiffs asserted that there was a direct payment agreement that the defendant would pay the balance of the construction cost and the construction cost to the plaintiffs, a subcontractor of the construction work of this case, directly, but the defendant paid part of the construction cost to the plaintiffs.

It is insufficient to acknowledge that there was a direct payment agreement between the plaintiffs and the defendant on electrical construction and creative construction costs only by the partial statement of the evidence No. 8 and the testimony of the witness J of the trial party, and there is no other evidence, the plaintiffs' above assertion is rejected.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow