1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff succeeding intervenor's claim against the defendant is dismissed.

2...

(c) The authenticity may be recognized by a statement in two certificates of seal imprint;

each entry, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor’s assertion

A. According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay 53.5 million won (63.5 million won) as the balance of the agreed amount claim to the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff, who received the claim for the agreed amount under the above payment note from the plaintiff, and damages for delay.

B. First, the defendant asserts to the effect that D has repaid all of the above agreed amount obligations.

을 제1, 2호증의 각 기재에 의하면, 원고가 피고에게 2009. 7. 24. 강남경찰서에 피고를 상대로 하였던 고소를 취하하는 내용의 고소취하서를 작성하여 주고, 같은 해 10. 9. 다음과 같은 내용이 기재된 확인서에 서명과 sign(사인)을 하고 연락처를 기재한 후 교부한 사실이 인정된다(맞춤법을 일부 수정하였고, *이하는 원고가 수기로 작성한 것이다). 확인서 ◎ 본인은 B님에게 받아야할 계금 총액 육천삼백오십만 원(63,500,000원)을 D님에게 받았음을 확인합니다.

◎ A과 B님과의 계 불입관계는 모두 정산하였음을 확인합니다.

On October 9, 2009: A (Accessone omitted) contact: * He adjusted the amount of KRW 63,500,000 among the amount he has repaid to He.

However, according to the testimony of the party witness D and A, the plaintiff listens to the purport that D is obliged to pay its debt to the defendant and receive the debt from the defendant again in return for the payment of the debt to the plaintiff in lump sum, and made D a written confirmation as required by D and made D to pay it to the defendant, and D was liable for the debt to the defendant at the time of the delivery of the written confirmation, and thereafter, D was liable for the debt to the defendant more than the above agreed amount, but D issued the written confirmation to the defendant, the balance of the agreed amount to the plaintiff.