1. The defendant's money as stated in the separate sheet for calculation of unjust enrichment in attached Form 1 "the amount of unjust enrichment" to the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 10, 2005, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and publicly announced a housing site development plan as a planned area for the housing site development project (hereinafter “instant housing site development project”) with the daily Fran-gu Fran-si 586,835 square meters in Ansan-si as a planned area.

B. The Korea National Housing Corporation, as a project implementer for the housing site development project of this case, announced the compensation plan for the above project on March 20, 2006 and decided to specially supply housing sites, etc. within the project district to be developed as one of the relocation measures for those who lose their base of livelihood due to the above project, and on May 22, 2009, Korea National Housing Corporation was dissolved and the Defendant comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea National Housing Corporation.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant concluded each sales contract with H, etc. for each of the housing sites listed in the following item column (hereinafter “each of the instant sales contracts”) and subsequently comprehensively accepted the status of the Plaintiff A, C, D, and E under the consent of the Defendant as to each of the sales contracts with H, I, J, and K respectively.

Whether to take over a contract for the sale price of an object subject to the contract of a buyer, on September 28, 201, 1 H H 1: (a) Plaintiff A, 234.1㎡ 421,975,080, both for the concurrent use of Lone’s stores on September 29, 201; and (b) Plaintiff B, who entered into the contract on January 24, 201 on September 29, 201; (c) KRW 431,889,060, - 3 I - 201.2 square meters 398,72,290, 290, Plaintiff C, on September 28, 201, also for the concurrent use of a 205 square meter’s store and 45.2 square meters for the concurrent use of a 201.39,500,000 won, Plaintiff C, on March 10, 2011; (b) Plaintiff C acquired 45.7.241.7

D. The plaintiffs paid each of the delayed payment damages and the sale price reflecting the payer's advance payment by the relevant date stated in the attached Table 1 calculation sheet to the defendant, and the amount of money excluding delay damages paid shall be the above calculation sheet.