A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 24, 2016, at around 14:20, at the oral repair shop operated by the victim D on the road of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu C Building, the Defendant damaged the property by putting one sidewalk on the wall of the above shop without any justifiable reason, which was located on the wall of the above shop, and the market price of which is the victim’s ownership is unknown.

2. On April 24, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 14:30 on the roads in front of the Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, and “the drinking person saw a stone.”

A man reported 112, “A spawn, spawn, etc.,” and assaulted by G, “A spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn on the right side side of G,” while “A spawn, spawn, spawn, spawn on the left side of G,” and “A spawn, spawn on the left side of G, spawn.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment with labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a person commits the instant crime in contingency under the influence of alcohol, the fact that an agreement is made with the victim of the crime of destruction, the fact that the criminal defendant violates the depth of the crime