beta
Text
1. Defendant Abnb Co., Ltd.:
A. Plaintiff A and B:32,241,712 won and its related thereto from July 17, 2013 to July 2015.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Plaintiff A and B are siblingsed specialists and buildings with both the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and F-ground single-story (hereinafter “instant building”).
) and G-ground single-story buildings (hereinafter referred to as “instant second buildings”)
A) The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant building from Plaintiff A and B, around 2012, and Plaintiff C operated a restaurant business with the trade name “H” from June 18, 2014. Defendant D is the owner of the adjacent Seoul Guro-gu Construction Work (hereinafter “instant construction work”). Defendant A is the constructor of the instant construction work (hereinafter “Defendant A&Contac”) who is the owner of the instant construction work.
B. Defendant AWnb Co., Ltd’s construction of the instant construction work, starting on January 17, 2013, and starting the instant construction work, up to July 17, 2013, had an adjacent building impact on the instant Nos. 1 and 2, following the instant construction work’s installation of soil removal, underground excavation construction, etc. from the immediately adjacent building Nos. 1 and 2, by July 17, 2013.
C. The result of the first appraisal of the instant building Nos. 1 and 2 (Appraiser J: whether the ground subsidences, and causations, etc. with the instant construction) 1 and 2 were built of cement block that could have relatively less durability compared to the steel reinforced concrete structure, etc., and some of the instant construction had already occurred before the instant construction. However, it was investigated that there were a large number of cracks during the instant construction work ( underground ground excavation work). 2) Since the ground ground of the instant building Nos. 1 and 2 was weak and the said underground excavation work may be deemed to have occurred due to the above underground excavation work, it is necessary to supplement the ground and repair the building cracks around the instant building.
The result of the second appraisal of the building Nos. 1 and 2 of this case (Appraiser K: the structural safety diagnosis, reinforcement work, etc.) is the parcel number E of the building No. 1 of this case.