logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고정1694
사기
Text

Defendant

B and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 2,000,000, respectively.

The above defendants each of the above defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B claimed insurance money from the MG Non-Life Insurance Office on June 13, 2013, from May 18, 2013 to June 8, 2013, on the grounds that both knee and kne-com, etc. were normally hospitalized for 22 days.

However, the symptoms of the defendant were not hospital treatment but hospital treatment, and the purpose of hospital treatment can be sufficiently achieved, and only a simple physical therapy, such as suping, suping, electric treatment, etc., has been received after taking the form of hospitalization through the assignment of sick rooms, and there is no fact that the defendant received the outpatient treatment. The other time was only the medical personnel who actually received the outpatient treatment without continuous observation while taking rest.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim MG non-life insurance and received KRW 1,420,00 from the victim as the insurance money on June 17, 2013, and acquired KRW 6,868,172 in total under the name of insurance money through eight times as shown in attached Table 1.

2. On June 25, 2013, Defendant C claimed insurance proceeds as if the Defendant had received normal hospitalized treatment for 17 days on the ground that, from June 3, 2013 to June 19, 2013, I members of the Ha located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council from June 3, 2013 to June 19, 2013, and on the ground that the right high level air routs, etc.

However, the symptoms of the defendant were not hospital treatment but hospital treatment, and the purpose of hospital treatment can be sufficiently achieved, and only a simple physical therapy, such as suping, suping, electric treatment, etc., has been received after taking the form of hospitalization through the assignment of sick rooms, and there is no fact that the defendant received the outpatient treatment. The other time was only the medical personnel who actually received the outpatient treatment without continuous observation while taking rest.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim life insurance and belongs to it on June 27, 2013.

arrow