logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.08 2017고정1966
주거침입등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In a state that the Defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to a mental fission;

1. Around November 14:20 of August 2017, 2017, a public performance obscene act was publicly conducted, such as returning to the neighboring body in the parking lot of Seongbuk-gu Seoul building C.

2. On August 11, 2017, around 20:08, the Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Police Station did not have returned home, and did not have been released from the public performance and obscenity. Around 20:08, the residents of the apartment complex in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, interfered with the actual peace and peace of the residents of the apartment complex, and continued to be heated and heated, and was placed in the front corridor No. 103 402, supra.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intrusion upon residence), Article 245 of the Criminal Act (the point of obscenity) and the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical weakness;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed by the Defendant to complete a program is accompanied by alcohol dependence on a mental fission, and it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s mental and physical loss had reached a state of mental and physical loss although it was difficult to view that it was difficult to judge and impulse with the mental fission, and that the Defendant’s order to complete a program is necessary to rectify the character and behavior through

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow