Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has been driving and lives as a new router from North Korea in 2008.

A. Around 01:00 on April 16, 2013, the Defendant interfered with business, calculated KRW 425,00 from the “Cju store” located in Pyeongtaek-si B with the drinking value, and obstructed the legitimate operation of the victim for about 30 minutes, such as: (a) the victim D (the owner of the said business, who is the owner of the said business (the 40-year-old-old-type-old-type-old-type-type-old-type-type-old-type-type-type-old-type-based-type-based-type-based-based-based-

B. The Defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties was above the Defendant around 01:20 on June 16, 2013.

As a slope F, who was called up after receiving a report at the location at the port of entry, used her home home, she would be a police officer, and she was called "Iss. Is. Is. Is. Is. I have been several universities and colleges." The Gap assaulted a police officer who is performing official duties, such as drinking, drinking, bating, bating, cutting down the fat, and cutting down the right shoulder, and arrested the police officer, and then arrested him to her, and fat off the back seat of the patrol while carrying out the patrol, and "Is. Is. I will am. Is. I will am. I will am. I will see. I will am. I will do so. I will am. I will am. I will do so. I will am. I will am. I will am. I will do so. I will am. I will am. I will am. I will am. I will do it. I will am. I will do. I will. I do..)".

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D and F;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant appears to have a tendency to change violently upon the withdrawal of alcohol, and that there is a need for strict punishment corresponding thereto in light of the fact that the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victims.

However, the defendant commits a crime.