The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (one year of imprisonment and additional collection) is too heavy.

2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the recognition of the crime, and the criminal records related to narcotics are not included in the punishment of 10 months on August 31, 1995, sentenced to imprisonment for violation of the mariana Control Act.

However, strict countermeasures are required for narcotics-related crimes that cause the degradation of individuals, families, and society as a whole.

Defendant has assisted the sale and purchase of narcotics, which is a highly harmful crime to society, such as the mass production of addicts.

In addition, considering the various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence sentenced by the court below is appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.