logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원(창원) 2016.11.23 2016누10902
업무정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance added "by September 10, 2015" to "for a period of eight months from December 2014 to July 2015, it shall be subject to investigation."

At the bottom of the second sentence of the first instance court, “30,317 won” in the second sentence shall be added to “(=2,642,540 won ± 8 months).”

Then, from the sixth side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “for the first instance,” the Plaintiff added the phrase “for the reason that the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have posted one social worker by failing to work more than the monthly working hours on February 2, 2015 and March 2015.”

Paragraph 3(4) of Paragraph 9 of the decision of the court of first instance is "paragraph 3(3)4 of the decision of the court of first instance".

The term "2. individual standards" shall be added between the 9th judgment of the first instance and the 22th judgment.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow