Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On February 1, 2008, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on January 15, 201, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the same court on January 15, 2010, and a summary order of KRW 5 million for the same crime at the same court on May 29, 2018, respectively.
【Criminal Facts】
On September 5, 2019, at around 20:57, the Defendant, without a driver’s license, driven the Defendant’s Hawning-III truck from about 1km to C, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.070% of blood alcohol level without a driver’s license.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;
1. Report on the situation of operation without a license;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind drinking power);
1. Relevant Article 152 subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of running a sound driving);
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. The sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the criminal records of the defendant, the nature and risk of the crime of this case, the background of the crime, the degree of taking the crime, the family relationship, the health condition of the defendant, and the possibility of recidivism, shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case.