1. The Defendant confirmed that the Plaintiff was included as the elected person in the B-S election for the audit of community credit cooperatives conducted on February 14, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) held an election to appoint two auditors who are scheduled to terminate their term of office as of February 25, 2015 (hereinafter “instant election”); and (b) the Plaintiff obtained 48 votes from three candidates.

(B) No. 2 C 38 marks, No. 1 marks, No. 33 marks).

The content of the Plaintiff’s pledge made a statement on the pledge (hereinafter “instant pledge”) that “If the Plaintiff had made efforts to carry out audit and inspection duties for three years at low time, the Plaintiff would allow the representative, who attended an ordinary general meeting of shareholders, to wear cash or merchandise coupons equivalent to KRW 100,000,00, which was present at the ordinary meeting of shareholders from the date following legitimate procedures, the Plaintiff made a statement on the pledge (hereinafter “instant pledge”).

C. On February 16, 2015, D, a candidate for the instant election, such as the Defendant’s resolution to invalidate the election of the election commission (the lowest winner), filed an objection pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Election Regulations, which applies to the Defendant’s election commission (hereinafter “election commission”), on the grounds that the instant pledge issued by the Plaintiff was illegal and has significant influence on the success of the election. The election commission, on February 26, 2015, filed an objection pursuant to Article 38(1) of the Election Regulations, which applies to the Defendant’s election commission. The instant pledge falls under Article 2(2)1 of the Community Credit Cooperatives Act (hereinafter “instant resolution to invalidate the election of the Plaintiff”) with respect to the Plaintiff on the ground that the objection was significant to have a significant effect on the election result, and the said objection was deemed to have been well-grounded (hereinafter “instant resolution to invalidate the election of the Plaintiff”), and only C, the next highest shareholder on February 27, 2015, publicly announced only

(Election Commission rendered a decision to hold a reelection as of March 21, 2015, on March 4, 2015, on the premise that the Plaintiff’s election invalidation is invalidated.

The relevant regulations are related to the executive election rules, the defendant's articles of association, and the Community Credit Cooperatives Act.