logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.29 2014가단106992
용역비
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of facility security business, service cleaning business, etc., and the defendant's management body is a management body composed of sectional owners of the sub-nam-si A commercial building (hereinafter "the instant commercial building"), which is an aggregate building, pursuant to the Act on Ownership and Management of Condominium Buildings (hereinafter "the Aggregate Buildings Act"), and the defendant B was a representative of the A prosperity conference, which is an organization with approximately twenty persons among the occupants of the instant commercial building.

B. On June 4, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive building management contract with Nonparty A Co., Ltd. (Representative C, et al. and three others) on the instant commercial building, and provided services for managing the instant commercial building. On May 19, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive building management contract with the Aud Association (Representative B) and provided services for managing the instant commercial building (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. On April 29, 2013, Defendant management body sent to the Plaintiff a certificate of the content of the title “the expiration (Notification) of the instant building management contract,” and notified the Plaintiff that “as the contract for the entrusted management of the Plaintiff and the instant commercial building terminates on June 30, 2013, Defendant management body will take over and hand over all business documents and accounting documents related to the instant commercial building before the contract is terminated, referring to its duties.”

The Plaintiff, until June 30, 2013, managed the instant commercial building, and was laid down in the instant commercial building around that time.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Gap evidence 3-1, 2, Gap evidence 4, 6, and 7, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The primary claim against the defendant management body and its judgment

A. The Defendant management body of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1 maintains its identity with the above prosperity body formed by telegraph A, and the legal effect of the above prosperity is entirely succeeded to the Defendant management body.

The plaintiff shall set up a prosperity and the contract of this case.

arrow