The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The court below rendered a judgment dismissing the prosecutor’s request regarding the part of the defendant’s case and the part of the case for which the request for the attachment order was filed, and there is no benefit of appeal regarding the part for which the request for the attachment order was filed.

Therefore, notwithstanding Article 9 (8) of the Act on Probation and Electronic Monitoring of Specific Criminal Offenders, the part regarding the request for attachment order is excluded from the scope of the trial of this court.

2. The summary of the grounds for appeal (eight years of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The Defendant had no record of punishment prior to the instant crime and appears to have an attitude to seriously reflect on his mistake.

However, the crime of this case is raped several times by the defendant to meet his own sexual desire, and its nature is very poor in light of the contents and methods of the crime.

It is clear that the victim suffered a very large mental impulse due to the crime of anti-humanity of the defendant, and the suffering and suffering therefrom will be a major obstacle to the victim's healthy and harmonious personality.

In full view of all the circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is determined to be an appropriate punishment corresponding to its liability.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

4. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, it is clear that the 18th sentence of the judgment below in the fourth 18th sentence is a clerical error in the prison labor for not less than 7 years and not more than 45 years.