The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On October 2015, the Defendant prepared the contents of “D” related to “D”, which is controversial to “D” (magazine) at the end of the end of the month, and sent them to “D” as follows, and made each report as “G” on November 2, 2015 and “H” on November 11, 2015.

The above adviser stated that “(1)” (i) “The Ferer made by the Arter on March 2, 1991, and (b) “The E White directly made an appraisal by the Arter, and notified the Hyundai National Art Gallery on April 2, 1991, and reported this fact to the media, F. F. E / E White did not have any reason to determine that the E White was a good, and the media did not make a reply to it.” (ii) “This material was recorded in the author’s judgment that it is important among his/her work, and was made several times, and during this process, why E White was not deducted with the writing of this material.”

“In the end, this case includes the following contents: “The Court did not make a determination,” and “The Decision, on April 12, shall be concluded as a good upon notification of the determination of the truth by the National Scientific Investigation Institute and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology.”

However, at the time of controversy over ‘F', E is not considered to be a master, but directly checking the original work of ‘F' brought by art gallery employees, and then sufficiently explain the reasons and grounds for the 'F' to be considered to be a master work, and asserts the writing. ② On January 13, 1990, as the E was not involved in the editing process of the ‘F' (the name for publication) written by K among the ‘J' issued by I, it is not a photograph directly recorded in the judgment that E is important. ③ E is not a photograph directly recorded in the editing process of the ‘F' (the name for publication) written by K, and there is no other legal response except for an interview which is the press. ④ On April 13, 1991, it is not true that E is not a court.