logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2012.11.16 2012고정883
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “accident”) is acquitted. Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

1. On January 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a DSS car at around 01:10, and (b) led to the driving of the DM car prior to cyber colleges of 57 U.S. Sinpo-Eup in Gwangju City, Gwangju City, along the two-lanes from the room of Gwangju City to the airside of Gwangju City, one speed of about 50 km each hour among the two-lanes.

At the time, there are nights and places where they are cross-sections at the front, so in such cases, the driver had a duty of care to reduce the speed and to drive safely while accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the time of front-way and failed to discover the FSS car for the victim E(33 years old) driving and received the back part of the above damaged vehicle as the front-way part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant, by its occupational negligence, committed an injury to the victim E in light of the climatic and the climatic salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim E, the injury to the climatic salt unit that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the passenger G (n, 28 years of age) of the above damaged vehicle, and the victim H (1 year of age) of the above damaged vehicle suffered an injury to the climatical climatical climatical climatical clif requiring medical treatment for about two weeks of the above damaged vehicle, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as stopping the said damaged vehicle, even if it damages the above damaged vehicle in excess of KRW 5,037,976 of the repairing cost.

2. In the event that the driver of the accident runs away without taking measures under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the victim, despite the awareness of the fact that the victim was killed due to the accident, it is impossible to determine who caused the accident by leaving the scene of the accident before performing the duty under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the victim, even though the driver of the accident knows that the victim was killed due to the accident.

arrow