All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following provisions are added between the five (5) and the two (2) of the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) thus,

2. Additional statements

C. The Plaintiffs asserts that, inasmuch as the Plaintiffs’ additional assertion is limited to the exercise of their rights by failing to obtain a construction permit regarding the land (the instant land, N,O, P, Q, R, and land) owned by the Plaintiffs (the instant land, N, P, Q, and R) that should be used as a passage or access road, the instant dispute portion ought to be deemed to be occupied to the extent that the Defendant actually excluded the Plaintiff’s possession, which is the landowner.

According to the purport of the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 8 and the oral argument, it is recognized that in May 2019, the Jeju mayor sent to the Plaintiff that “current I land is included in the site area at the time of the building report of the instant house, and the building permission on the RR land is inappropriate depending on the relationship between the site and the road (the site of the building shall be at least 2 meters on the road) stipulated under Article 44 of the Building Act,” but it is merely a judgment of the administrative agency that examines the requirements for building permission under the Building Act, and it does not mean that the Defendant is in possession by de facto controlling the dispute part of the instant case from the perspective of the Civil Act, solely based on the foregoing circumstances with regard to the meaning of possession or the recognition thereof.

In addition, even if the plaintiffs are judged to refer to the request for extradition regarding the dispute part of this case against the defendant, "I land is now subject to this.