A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant, on August 20, 2016, committed an indecent act by force, at around 02:00, a 19 room “D” located in Ansan-si Group C, a member of Ansan-si, and 19 rooms, followed the victim E (one’s name, one’s age, 47) and one’s singing and talked with the Defendant, and committed an indecent act against the victim by having the victim’s chest flick with the Defendant’s own hand.

2. The Defendant assaulted the victim E, who was in indecent conduct at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1 as above, by taking the victim E’s clock with sound, free cup, etc. from the Defendant at one time, by her hand, and destroying the victim E by pushing the victim E, and making the victim go against the victim F with the wall, by taking the victim F’s clock.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F, and part of witness G, legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there was no fact that the defendant sent his chest.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, i.e., (i) the victim E consistently states that the defendant was satisfing his chest from the investigative agency to this court; (ii) the witness’s interest victim F has consistently made a statement to the same purport as the victim; (iii) the defendant submitted a written statement to the police immediately after the defendant’s act was committed; and (iv) the defendant also recognized the fact that the victim was approaching the victim’s chest, and (v) the defendant also recognized the fact that the victim was satisfing, thereby sufficiently recognizing the fact that the defendant committed an indecent act by the victim. Accordingly, the defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion is without merit).

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, respectively;