1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff claims damages against the defendant C in subrogation of the defendant B corporation.

1. Basic facts are based on this part of this Court’s reasoning that ① the third third 12th 12th st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st

3. From January 1, 200 to December 20, 2010, the Plaintiff: (a) deposited KRW 711,764,037 with Defendant Company’s bank account as its child; (b) embezzled KRW 78,330,00 in total from the above account to the F, G, and H bank account as of October 17, 2005 to December 31, 2010; (c) embezzled KRW 62,00 in total from January 1, 200 to December 20, 201; and (d) embezzled KRW 305,00 in the name of Defendant Company with Defendant Company’s personal debt 205 to be paid to Defendant Company’s employee; and (e) embezzled KRW 975,00 in the name of Defendant Company with Defendant Company’s personal debt 30,000 in the name of 205; and (e) embezzled KRW 300,000 in the name of Defendant Company.

2. Determination on the main defense of the defendant company

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant Company appealed only against KRW 100 million among the part against the Plaintiff in the judgment of the first instance against the Defendant Company and damages for delay thereof, and the remaining part against the Plaintiff was finalized as it is.

However, the plaintiff added "the amount of the first instance trial (161,260,931 won and damages for delay)" to 200 million won.