The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment, and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the defendant's mistake and there is no criminal punishment; victim D wants the defendant's wife, there is a family member to support the defendant; and each of the crimes of this case seems to be not to have many profits from the defendant. However, the crime of Bosing like this case is deemed to require strict punishment because social harm is very high; damage to each of the crimes of this case is considerably high; damage is not recovered; most of the damage is not recovered; the defendant assumes an employee of the Financial Services Commission; the defendant assumes the person in charge of the crime of this case and presents relevant documents; and considering all other circumstances that are the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstance and contents leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the above argument of the defendant cannot be deemed to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.