logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.06.16 2015고단1505
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a cargo vehicle of one ton of C.

On June 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the said vehicle at a distance of approximately 2 km from 0.213% of alcohol level among the blood transfusion around 06:00 to 85 times in front of the Gyeonggi-si through G-si of the same Eup from G-si to Dong-ro of the same Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F and protocol of witness examination;

1. Notification of the result of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol, the situation report on the driver of drinking alcohol, and each photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act (ten-year period of imprisonment shall be determined in consideration of the fact that there is no record of punishment, health status, etc.);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion as to Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is that the defendant did not drive alcohol even though he did not drink in the vehicle because he did not drive alcohol.

It is argued in the court.

Specifically, “A vehicle was driven at a company’s lodging room without drinking alcohol to purchase 3 sicks frequently at a gS25 convenience store (the purchase data was submitted),” and the vehicle was driven before the est g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g.

According to each evidence, the defendant's vehicle was parked in the first set of the second set of the road from right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right to right and right to right to right to right to right and right to right to right to right to right and right to right to right to right to right and right to right to right and right to right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to right and right to freedom

arrow