logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.05.28 2014고단1681
노동조합및노동관계조정법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 8 months, for Defendant B to be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and for Defendant C to be punished by imprisonment for 6 months.

Defendant

B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On October 16, 2014, the Seoul High Court sentenced a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation) at the Seoul High Court on 2014, which became final and conclusive on 24 October 2014.

Defendant

A is the F representative director of corporation, Defendant B is the managing director of corporation F, Defendant C as the managing director of corporation F, and Defendant C is the management director of F, who acts on behalf of the business owner in respect of the matters relating to workers.

No employer shall control or intervene in the organization or operation of a trade union by workers.

Defendant

A around April 2013, around April 2013, Defendant B and Defendant C instructed the said trade union members to withdraw from the said trade union on the grounds that G, the chairman of the F Branch of the Seoul Bus Workers’ Union F Branch (hereinafter “F Branch”) has ever wideed his employment rain, etc., and to encourage Defendant B and Defendant C to join the F Branch of the Seoul Bus Workers’ Union F Branch of the Seoul Bus Workers’ Union (hereinafter “branch branch”).

Defendant

B: (a) around April 4, 2013, Defendant C recommended that the F Branch’s union members I, J, K, L, M, N, etc. who belong to the F Branch’s union and move to the F Branch to the F Branch on the same day, including the F Branch’s withdrawal from the F Branch and the F Branch’s recommendation to move to the branch.

In addition, around April 16, 2013, Defendant C recommended that the labor union move to another trade union by stating that “the labor union members affiliated with the F branch could not work like F branch because he could not work like F branch” to the branch office located in the third floor.”

As a result, the Defendants jointly belong to the F Branch.

arrow