beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 162,585,167 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from November 24, 2015 to April 21, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant’s establishment and business promotion is a regional housing association that obtained authorization for establishment for the purpose of constructing a collective housing in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Group, and obtained approval for a project plan that newly constructs D apartment 299 households in the project site (276 households in partnership houses, 23 households in general) as a joint project proprietor and a company proprietor and has obtained approval for a project plan on December 28, 2005.
B. On September 18, 2007, the Plaintiff agreed to join the Plaintiff’s association members and the conclusion of the supply contract for the apartment of this case and payment 1) around early September 2007, the Plaintiff entered the Defendant as the Defendant’s members. The Plaintiff entered the Plaintiff’s address and resident registration number in the form of “B”, “B regional housing association membership agreement”, and other documents necessary for joining the association, and issued it to the Defendant after signing a written name and sealing. Among them, at the end of the subscription contract, there are each names and seals in the name of the Defendant (the president of the association) and the Gyeongnam company’s name and seal in the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the eth of the 1.
on September 1, 2007, 231,00,000 on December 15, 2007, 200 on September 1, 2007; 30,000 on April 15, 200 on April 1, 2008; 15,000,000 on July 30, 200 on July 30, 2008; 5,000,00 on May 15, 200 on December 28, 2008; 6,673, 200, 200 on December 9, 208; 15, 2007; 142,154, 2039,437,410 on September 23, 2007;
C. The plaintiff's occupancy of the apartment of this case and the defendant's registration of preservation of ownership of the apartment of this case are 19.