1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant is the project implementer of the Namyang-ju B project (hereinafter "the project in this case"). The plaintiff is the owner at the time of the expropriation of the housing unit C (hereinafter "the housing in this case") admitted as the project in this case. The plaintiff is the owner at the time of expropriation of the housing unit C (hereinafter "the housing in this case").

Subparagraph (E) Results of review (Intermediate omission): Disqualified reasons for non-resident relocation measures: non-resident relocation measures: (a) non-resident relocation measures: (b) non-resident relocation measures; (c) non-resident relocation measures: (d) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; and (e) resident relocation measures; (d) resident registration date; (e) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; (e) resident registration date; and (e) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; (e) resident registration date; (g) resident registration date; (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; (d) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date; and (d) resident registration date; and (d) resident registration date; (g) resident registration date; and (g) resident registration date was notified to the Plaintiff;

hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”

(ii) [In the absence of a dispute over the basis of recognition, entry in Gap's 1, 3, 4, Eul's 3 and 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff 1 purchased the housing of this case on February 10, 1990.